A New Era For Middle Powers
- Anjali Regmi
- Jan 23
- 5 min read
The snow capped peaks of Davos often serve as the backdrop for polite diplomatic small talk, but this year, the atmosphere felt markedly different. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney took to the stage at the World Economic Forum with a message that was anything but subtle. It was a speech that many are calling a turning point for Canada’s role on the global stage. For years, Canada has been seen as the quiet, reliable neighbor to the south, but Carney’s words signaled a shift toward a much more assertive and independent foreign policy. He spoke of a world in the midst of a rupture, a total break from the rules that have governed global trade and security for decades. While he spoke to a room full of global elites, his message was clearly directed at two very specific audiences: the leadership in Washington and the rising power in New Delhi.
The speech was a masterclass in modern diplomacy, blending a realistic assessment of global threats with a hopeful vision for new alliances. Carney did not just talk about the economy; he talked about survival in a world where the old "rules-based order" is fading away. He warned that middle powers, countries that are influential but not superpowers, can no longer afford to be passive observers. The message was clear: if you are not at the table, you are on the menu. This phrase, which echoed throughout the halls of the forum, served as a rallying cry for nations like Canada and India to find common ground in an increasingly unpredictable world.

Facing The Reality Of Hard Power
At the heart of Carney’s address was a direct acknowledgment of the tension between Canada and the United States. Without spending the entire time naming names, it was obvious that the current administration in Washington was in his crosshairs. The Prime Minister spoke about the rise of "hard power," where military might and economic coercion are used to bend other nations to one’s will. This was a sharp departure from the "soft power" approach often championed by his predecessor, Justin Trudeau. While Trudeau was also present in Davos speaking about the virtues of cultural influence and diplomacy, Carney’s tone was much more focused on the hard realities of 2026.
He specifically addressed the growing pressure from the U.S. regarding territorial interests and trade tariffs. The mention of Greenland, a topic that has recently dominated headlines due to American interest in the territory, was a significant moment. Carney reaffirmed Canada’s support for the sovereignty of Greenland and Denmark, standing firm against the idea that land can be treated as a mere commodity for purchase by larger powers. By doing so, he positioned Canada as a defender of international norms at a time when those norms are being tested. This wasn't just a speech for the Canadian public; it was a signal to the world that Canada will not be pushed around, even by its closest ally.
A Strategic Pivot To India
Perhaps the most significant part of the speech for the global community was Carney’s focus on India. He made it clear that Canada sees India as a vital partner in this new, fractured world. The "unite" message for India was not just about trade; it was about building a coalition of middle powers that can balance the influence of the world’s superpowers. Carney emphasized that the future of the global economy and security depends on how well countries like Canada and India can work together. He spoke about the need for "variable geometry" in diplomacy, which basically means forming different groups for different goals, whether it is climate change, technology, or defense.
The timing of this message is crucial. Relations between Canada and India have seen their fair share of ups and downs over the past few years, but Carney seems determined to hit the reset button. He highlighted the ongoing negotiations for a major trade pact and noted that both nations share a common interest in maintaining a stable and fair global system. By inviting India to lead alongside Canada, Carney is acknowledging that the traditional Western-centric view of the world is changing. He is betting on the idea that a strong partnership between a North American middle power and an Asian giant can create a new center of gravity in international politics.
Moving Beyond The Shadow Of The Superpowers
A recurring theme in the speech was the idea of "strategic autonomy." Carney argued that for too long, many countries have relied on the protection of superpowers, only to find that such protection often comes with strings attached. He pointed out that the "freebies" or benefits of being in a superpower’s orbit are no longer guaranteed and can be withdrawn at any moment. To counter this, he urged middle powers to build their own "fortresses" of resilience but warned against isolationism. He argued that building higher walls is not the answer; instead, nations should build bridges with each other to share resources, technology, and intelligence.
This part of the address resonated with many leaders from smaller nations who feel caught in the middle of great power rivalries. Carney’s vision is one of a more cooperative and resilient world where nations are judged by their values and their contributions to the common good, rather than just their military budget. He praised the work of previous Canadian leaders in building a progressive state but insisted that nostalgia is not a strategy. The world has changed, and the old ways of doing business are gone. The standing ovation he received suggested that his peers are ready for this new approach.
The Road Ahead For Global Cooperation
As the dust settles on this year's Davos summit, the impact of Carney's speech is still being felt. It has sparked a conversation about what it means to be a middle power in the 21st century. For Canada, it marks the beginning of a more assertive era where the country is willing to stand its ground on the world stage. For India, it presents an opportunity to further solidify its role as a global leader and a key player in a new network of alliances. The challenge now will be to turn these words into action. Trade deals need to be signed, security agreements need to be forged, and trust needs to be rebuilt.
The road ahead won't be easy. The superpowers are not likely to give up their influence without a fight, and the world remains a volatile place. However, Carney’s speech provided a roadmap for how countries can navigate these choppy waters. By focusing on shared values, economic diversification, and mutual respect, he has offered an alternative to the "might makes right" philosophy that has become all too common. Whether this vision of a united front of middle powers becomes a reality remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: the conversation in Davos has changed, and the world is watching to see what happens next.



Comments