Kajol Sparks Debate on Marriage Expiry Date and Renewal Option
- Anjali Regmi
- Nov 15, 2025
- 4 min read
Recently, Bollywood actress Kajol made headlines for her unconventional opinion on marriage. She suggested that marriages should come with a fixed expiry date and a renewal option. According to her, this approach would allow couples to regularly reassess their compatibility. Her comments have triggered discussions across social media, news platforms, and households alike. People are now debating whether marriage, as a lifelong commitment, needs to be reimagined in today’s world.

The Concept Behind Expiry Date in Marriage
The idea of a marriage expiry date is unusual but not entirely new in modern conversations about relationships. Kajol’s suggestion implies that couples would enter into marriage with an agreed period, such as five or ten years. At the end of this period, they would decide whether to continue the marriage or part ways. She also mentioned the renewal option, which is similar to a contract renewal. This would give couples the chance to reflect on their relationship, evaluate their happiness, and consciously choose to stay together or separate without social stigma.
Why Kajol Believes This Could Work
Kajol explained that over time, relationships change. People grow and develop different interests, desires, and priorities. Sometimes couples drift apart unintentionally. By introducing a fixed term in marriage, she believes couples would be encouraged to communicate better, resolve issues consciously, and value their time together. Instead of staying in a marriage because of social pressure or fear, this system would allow people to make a thoughtful decision. It is about respecting individual growth while also nurturing the relationship.
Public Reactions and Opinions
The actress’s statement has received mixed reactions. Some people praised her for being bold and thinking about the future of relationships in a practical way. They feel that the concept could reduce unnecessary conflicts and divorces. Others disagreed strongly, saying marriage is built on love, trust, and commitment. They argue that introducing expiry dates could make marriages fragile and transactional. Many traditionalists expressed concern that it could weaken family structures and go against cultural values. On social media, the debate is heated, with hashtags supporting and opposing the idea trending frequently.
The Psychological Perspective
Psychologists have also weighed in on this discussion. They say that Kajol’s idea highlights an important point about emotional compatibility. Relationships require constant effort, communication, and compromise. Having a fixed term could prompt couples to evaluate their relationship more consciously. It may also reduce resentment and frustration, which often build when one partner feels trapped or neglected. However, experts also warn that such a system could create anxiety about the future and make couples overly focused on timelines instead of enjoying the present.
Historical Context of Marriage
Traditionally, marriage has been seen as a lifelong commitment. It is often associated with religious, cultural, and social norms. In many societies, divorce carries stigma, making people endure unhappy marriages. Over the past few decades, attitudes have changed, especially in urban areas. More people are open to cohabitation, separation, and remarriage. Kajol’s suggestion reflects this evolving mindset where individual happiness is gaining importance alongside family values.
Challenges of Implementing Expiry Dates
While the concept sounds intriguing, it comes with several challenges. Legal systems would need to adapt to allow temporary marriages with renewal clauses. Questions about property, children, and finances would need careful consideration. There could also be emotional consequences, as people might approach relationships with a sense of uncertainty. Planning life with an expiry date might make some couples hesitant to invest emotionally or financially. Therefore, while the idea is thought-provoking, it would require careful planning and awareness campaigns before implementation.
Benefits of a Renewal Option
The renewal option is perhaps the most interesting part of Kajol’s proposal. It allows couples to consciously decide to stay together, which could strengthen the bond. Unlike traditional marriages where some couples stay together out of habit, fear, or social pressure, renewal ensures that both partners are genuinely committed. It can also encourage honest communication and accountability in the relationship. Partners may take more effort to understand each other’s needs, grow together, and nurture mutual respect.
Marriage in the Modern World
In today’s fast-paced and changing world, relationships face different pressures. Career demands, long-distance situations, financial stress, and lifestyle differences can strain marriages. Many couples struggle to balance personal happiness with relationship responsibilities. Kajol’s idea reflects an awareness of these challenges. By introducing a structured way to reassess relationships, couples may avoid prolonged unhappiness and make healthier choices. It also emphasizes the importance of personal growth and emotional well-being within the marriage.
Cultural and Social Implications
If implemented, marriage expiry dates could have a profound impact on society. It may normalize separation and reduce the stigma around divorce. Couples may approach marriage more honestly, and children might witness healthier relationships even if parents part ways. On the other hand, critics worry that such a system could weaken family bonds and make commitment appear temporary. Society would need to evolve its views on relationships, responsibility, and parenting to accommodate such changes.
A Balanced View
Kajol’s suggestion is bold and controversial, but it opens the door for meaningful discussion. It forces society to think about the purpose of marriage and how it can adapt to modern challenges. While it may not be practical or acceptable for everyone, it highlights the importance of choice, communication, and conscious commitment. Every couple has unique dynamics, and what works for one may not work for another. The key takeaway is that relationships should not be passive agreements but active, evolving partnerships.
Conclusion
Kajol’s idea of a marriage with an expiry date and renewal option challenges traditional thinking and sparks debate. It raises important questions about compatibility, happiness, and commitment. While it may not be universally accepted, it encourages people to reflect on the meaning of marriage and the value of conscious decision-making. Ultimately, relationships thrive when both partners are willing to grow, communicate, and choose each other every day. Whether through traditional commitment or modern approaches, the essence of marriage remains the same: mutual respect, love, and effort.



Comments