top of page

Trump Signals "Very Strong Options" for Iran: What This Means for Global Stability

  • Writer: Anjali Regmi
    Anjali Regmi
  • Jan 12
  • 4 min read


​The geopolitical landscape has shifted dramatically as we enter the second week of January 2026. After a weekend of intense reports, President Donald Trump has confirmed that the United States military is currently reviewing "very strong options" regarding Iran. This announcement follows three weeks of escalating nationwide protests within the Islamic Republic, which have met a violent response from the Iranian government.

​For many, this feels like a moment of historical weight. With tensions at an all-time high and a "red line" apparently crossed, the world is looking at Washington to see what comes next. The following breakdown explores the details of the President's statements, the situation on the ground in Iran, and the potential global fallout.

​The Red Line and the President’s Stance

​On Sunday, speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, President Trump made it clear that his patience with the Iranian leadership is wearing thin. He suggested that Iran has already started crossing his "red line" concerning the treatment of its own citizens. When asked specifically if that line had been breached, Trump noted that "some people, who were not supposed to be killed, have been killed."

​The President emphasized that he is receiving hourly updates on the situation. "The military is looking at it, and we're looking at some very strong options," he stated. While he hinted that Iranian leadership had reached out to negotiate, he added a sobering warning: "We may have to act before a meeting." This suggests that the window for a purely diplomatic solution might be closing rapidly.




​A Country in Turmoil: The Protests of 2026

​The current crisis began in late December 2025, sparked initially by economic grievances, the plummeting value of the rial, and soaring living costs. However, what started as a protest over bread and fuel quickly evolved into a broader movement against the clerical establishment. By mid-January 2026, the unrest has spread to all 31 provinces of Iran, including cities traditionally loyal to the state like Mashhad.

​Human rights organizations report a staggering toll. While the Iranian government has not confirmed a total number of civilian casualties, activist groups suggest that at least 538 people have been killed in the crackdown. Over 10,000 people have reportedly been arrested, and a nationwide internet blackout has been in place for several days. Trump’s rhetoric has focused heavily on these rights issues, posting on social media that "Iran is looking at FREEDOM" and that the United States "stands ready to help."

​What Are the "Strong Options"?

​While the President has been characteristically vague about the specific nature of these "strong options," senior administration officials and various reports have shed some light on what is on the table. It is important to note that Trump has explicitly stated he is not currently looking for "boots on the ground" in a traditional sense. Instead, the options likely involve:

  • Targeted Military Strikes: Precision strikes against Iranian security forces or military infrastructure used to suppress the protests.

  • Advanced Cyber Operations: Using "secret cyberweapons" to disrupt the Iranian regime's communications and its ability to monitor or crack down on citizens.

  • Support for Internet Access: Reports suggest the administration is working with private tech companies like SpaceX to deploy Starlink terminals, helping Iranians bypass the government-imposed blackout.

  • Extreme Economic Pressure: Even tighter sanctions targeting the "shadow fleet" that allows Iran to continue exporting oil despite previous restrictions.

​Iran’s Stark Warning of Retaliation

​Tehran has not taken these threats lightly. Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf issued a direct response, stating that in the event of a US attack, all American military centers, bases, and ships in the region would become "legitimate targets." He specifically mentioned that Iran would not wait to react after an action but would act based on "objective signs of a threat."

​This "preemptive" rhetoric raises the stakes for every US ally in the Middle East. If a conflict were to break out, the ripple effects would be felt immediately across the region, potentially affecting energy transit through the Strait of Hormuz and the security of US bases in neighboring countries.

​The Impact on the Global Economy and Oil

​The mere mention of military options has already sent a jolt through the energy markets. Oil prices achieved gains for a third straight week as the protests in Iran intensified. Brent crude has been hovering around the $62 mark, but traders warn that a direct military confrontation could send prices much higher.

​Investors are currently caught in a "complex dance." On one hand, there is a global surplus of oil being produced by the US and South American countries. On the other hand, Iran's position as a major regional player means any conflict could disrupt shipping and supply lines. If the US military moves from "considering options" to "executing actions," the volatility at the fuel pump will be the first thing everyday citizens notice.

​Looking Ahead: The Tuesday Meeting

​The next major milestone in this developing story is a scheduled meeting on Tuesday between the President and his senior national security advisors. This meeting is expected to be where the "determination" Trump spoke about will be made. The world will be watching to see if the administration chooses a path of further sanctions, a major cyber operation, or limited military intervention.

​The situation in Iran is fluid and dangerous. As the protests continue and the death toll rises, the pressure on Washington to "do something" is balanced against the very real risk of starting a wider regional war. President Trump’s "very strong options" are now the central focus of global diplomacy, and the decisions made this week will likely define the geopolitical landscape for the rest of 2026.


 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page